| |
|
|
ACTION
|
|
1.
|
|
Election of Chair
|
|
| |
|
Bryan Kennedy chaired the meeting in accordance with the decision
made under item 5a) at the October meeting.
|
|
|
2.
|
|
Apologies:
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
Mrs Ivy Matkin, Mrs Jill Excell, Ms Sheila Seabury.
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
Sue Goldman stated with her apologies that she will probably be
unable to attend until September. The committee discussed the lack
of attendance and noted that this was the second inquorate meeting
since the AGM. Tarja Kanzen was asked if she was interested in becoming
a HAWK TRA Committee member as she had attended previous meetings.
Tarja Kanzen stated that she was interested but was unlikely to
attend all the meetings.
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
Agreed to co-opt Tarja Kanzen as a committee member subject
to agreement by a quorate committee meeting.
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
Agreed that the Tenant Support Worker contact other residents
who are interested in being TRA Committee members with a view to
co-opting them at the next committee meeting.
|
Tenant Support Worker
|
|
3.
|
|
Minutes of 8th January - Accuracy
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
Item 4.7 iii) Letter from Arthur Ringrose - Second paragraph
first sentence: Should read "Paul Sprenger left the meeting
as he was unwell".
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
Item 4.7 iv) Letter from Arthur Ringrose - Paul Sprenger
pointed out that the statement made by Ivy Matkin should have been
reproduced in the minutes. The Minute-Taker stated that he had made
no record of the statement. Members stated that Ivy had made the
same points as in previous meetings.
Agreed to alter first line: Change "Ivy Matkin made
a statement" to "Ivy Matkin re-iterated her position
as recorded in paragraphs the minutes of 4th December".
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
Item 8.1 Service Level Agreement with Haggerston Area Trust
- Line 6: Change " fund allocation so that only one
organisation" to "fund allocation to only one organisation".
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
Monique Carter proposed agreement of minutes with above amendments,
seconded by Pat Phillips, agreed.
|
|
|
4.
|
|
Matters Arising from 8th February:
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
Item 4.1 - Report Back from Canalside, Soundproofing - Sue
Goldman not present. The Tenant Support Worker reported that Canalside
were to do some tests on the proposed soundproofing.
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
Item 4.2 iii) - Newsletter, Distribution - Distribution
has been done to all blocks except those in Haggerston West.
|
Brian Kennedy
|
|
|
4.3 |
Item 5.3 Incoming Post, HAWK TRA Representative for Haggerston
Area Trust Board -
|
|
|
|
4.3.1 |
The Tenant Support Worker reported that he had not put an item
asking for volunteers in the newsletter because it would be unlikely
to produce results. He suggested that someone could be voted on
at the next HAWK TRA General Meeting to be held soon. Brian Kennedy
had cleared up the criteria and status of nominees from the HAWK
TRA Committee: They could live in any HAWK TRA property including
Whitmore Estate as long as they represented HAWK TRA at the Trust
Board meetings.
|
|
|
|
4.3.2 |
Agreed to discuss General Meeting date under Any Other Business
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
Item 4.4 Letter to Haggerston West Estate Committee Regarding
Drains and Empty Flats -
|
|
|
|
4.4.1 |
The Estate Committee had discussed the letter, minutes of the meeting
were available. Pat Phillips reported that the residents and Tenant
Support Worker had done a "walk around" inspection of
the estate. The residents had noted 8 points that needed attention
at the walk-around: 1) Water over flow to 4 Harlowe House Balcony;
2) Scaffold poles left on ground outside Harlowe House; 3) Water
over flow to back of Community Centre; 4) Mattress on green outside
23 Harlowe House; 5) Burnt out car outside Samuel House has been
there for 2 years; 6) 3 new paladin bins to be ordered for Harlowe
and Pamela House; 7) Drains to be cleared throughout estate; 8)
Blue metal screens from void flats left outside Harlowe House and
not removed. Only items 4) and 7) had been done to date. The estate
manager, Beatrice Bellot, had stated that due to the increased size
of her patch she did not have time to walk up the stairs and check
the balconies during the inspections. Beatrice Bellot had said that
she had not realised what a state the estate was in.
|
|
|
|
4.4.2 |
Agreed that for the next inspection residents should do a full
walk-around to note the defects on the estate before the estate
manager arrives.
|
Residents of Haggerston West
|
|
|
4.4.3 |
The next Haggerston West Estate Committee meeting is due in April.
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Item 4.7 Letter from Arthur Ringrose -
|
|
|
|
4.5.1 |
Brian Kennedy has replied to the letter. The Tenant Support Worker
has lost the copies but Brian Kennedy will print some more out.
Arthur Ringrose has written 2 letters back. One letter, received
at the meeting, noted the omission of Ivy Matkin’s statement (discussed
under item 3.2 of these minutes). The other letter, replying to
Brian Kennedy’s letter had been left in Brian Kennedy’s tray but
has not been read.
|
|
|
|
4.5.2 |
Brian Kennedy added that the HAWK TRA policy is to oppose building
on the LEB site - the HAWK TRA has been inactive on this issue and
left things to the EDMC. If Arthur Ringrose feels they should be
more pro-active then he could suggest actions that the committee
should take.
|
|
|
|
4.5.3 |
Paul Sprenger re-iterated his position that TRA Committee members
should not vote against TRA policy when on other committees, even
if elected as individual residents and not as TRA nominees.
|
|
|
|
4.5.4 |
Brian Kennedy felt that the HAWK TRA Committee was more democratic
than the Canalside EDMC. The Tenant Support Worker felt there was
a problem with the democratic representation of tenants views at
the Canalside Community Board. The surveys of residents surrounding
the LEB site showed that residents reps who had been elected to
the Canalside Community Board and the EDMC could vote against residents
wishes.
|
|
|
|
4.5.5 |
Members present still felt that the Arthur Ringrose and Paul Sprenger
should not be focusing attention on individual members.
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Item 6.2 - Report Back from Other Organisations, Ascent 21
- There has still been no response from Ascent 21 to the HAWK TRA
Chair’s letter asking for minutes of meetings.
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Item 7.2 - Food Co-op Report - Monique Carter wanted to
raise the matter under "Report Back" on the agenda if
there was enough time.
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Item 8 - Service Level Agreement with Haggerston Area Trust
- Lorna Meade reported that she had not had a further meeting with
Jill Excell.
|
Lorna Meade, JE
|
|
5.
|
|
Incoming Post Received
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
The Tenant Support Worker reported that the Metropolitan Police
were looking for volunteers to help with race awareness. Volunteers
would be reimbursed for their time. Anyone interested to contact
the Tenant Support Worker.
|
Any interested Residents
|
|
6.
|
|
Report Back
|
|
| |
|
The Tenant Support Worker had laid out copies of reports, letters
and recent minutes of various organisations for anyone who wanted
to read them.
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
CANALSIDE - all committees
|
|
|
|
6.1.1 |
Motion Opposing Proposed Reduction in Standards to the Refurbishment
programme.
|
|
|
|
6.1.1 |
i)The Tenant Support Worker stated that the HAWK TRA Committee
had passed a motion in December last year on this matter and asked
if members wanted to send a delegation to the next Canalside Board
meeting. Tom Seabury stated that this meeting was where the contracts
for refurbishment were likely to be discussed, he pointed out that
the residents had succeeded in reducing proposed cuts to Orme House
by sending a delegation.
|
|
|
|
6.1.1 |
ii) Monique Carter presented a petition opposing the cuts which
HAWK TRA residents had started and asked the HAWK TRA to endorse
it.
|
|
|
|
6.1.1 |
iii)Agreed to endorse the residents petition against the reduction
in standards of Canalside’s refurbishment.
|
|
|
|
6.1.1 |
iv)The Tenant Support Worker stated that the next Canalside Community
Board meeting is to be held on Tuesday 13th February. Committee
members felt that there should be a delegation and that residents
from Haggerston West should attend as they were due to ballot on
Canalside as a possible landlord.
|
|
|
|
6.1.1 |
v)Agreed that Monique Carter, Colin Bailey, Tom Seabury, Brian
Kennedy and Paul Sprenger to attend the meeting.
|
See left
|
|
|
6.1.2 |
Tom Seabury reported that there had been a water shortage for 6
days on Whitmore Estate due to lack of water pressure. The Canalside
contractors had been unable to locate the problem which was due
to a leak. Canalside had agreed to reimburse tenants for a weeks
rent.
|
|
|
|
6.1.3 |
Tom Seabury reminded residents that major works were imminent on
Whitmore Estate, including the LEB site. The works had been due
to start in January. There will be major disruption to residents.
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
HAGGERSTON WEST
|
|
|
|
6.2.1 |
Pat Phillips stated that some of her report about the estate matters
had been covered previously (see item 4.4 under "Matters Arising").
|
|
|
|
6.2.2 |
Estate Committee - Council Vandalism of Empty Flats
|
|
|
|
6.2.3 |
Pat Phillips stated that the Council had started getting court
orders against squatting but others were moving in. The Tenant Support
Worker reported that the Council were proposing to destroy the insides
of the flats to make them uninhabitable by squatters and that the
Estate Committee opposed this.
|
|
|
|
6.2.4 |
A discussion followed, residents made the following points:
|
|
|
|
6.2.5 |
i) One member felt that the repairs would be too expensive and
reported that London Fields co-operative had already turned down
the flats for short term lettings because they could not be repaired.
|
|
|
|
6.2.5 |
ii) The Council is avoiding even minimal expenses.
|
|
|
|
6.2.5 |
iii) The flats should be re-let to homeless people.
|
|
|
|
6.2.5 |
iii) Pre-letting of empty flats would also allow proper eviction
of the squatters with no subsequent re-squatting.
|
|
|
|
6.2.5 |
iv) The flats could be made inhabitable with basic repairs and
some homeless people would take them if offered.
|
|
|
|
6.2.5 |
v) Landlords talk about sustainable communities which means moving
in tenants not leaving flats empty.
|
|
|
|
6.2.5 |
vi) The flats were originally planned to be transferred to Canalside
for refurbishment along with Haggerston East and were now planned
to be refurbished under new proposals - the Council had used the
planned refurbishment as a reason not to let the empty flats.
|
|
|
|
6.2.5 |
vii) Some Council housing staff were saying that it would not be
fair to let the flats to tenants if they were soon to be transferred
out of Council ownership.
|
|
|
|
6.2.5 |
viii)Agreed to support the Estate Committees opposition to the
Council deliberately vandalising the void (untenanted) flats and
to support the letting of the flats to homeless people.
|
|
|
|
6.2.6 |
EDMC and HAT not discussed.
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
OTHER ORGANISATIONS
|
|
| |
|
Not discussed
|
|
|
7
|
|
Projects
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
IT Project
|
|
| |
|
Minutes from December and report available. Not discussed.
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
Food Co-op (verbal report, Monique Carter)
|
|
|
|
7.2.1 |
Monique Carter proposed that the food co-op be registered as a
separate organisation in line with the HAWK TRA’s commitment of
last year and that £1,000 of Food Co-op funds be put aside for this
purpose. Brian Kennedy stated that he had been telephone by Nick
Strauss (ex-Treasurer) who had several reservations about the scheme
and he did not want to make a decision at this meeting.
|
|
|
|
7.2.2 |
Monique Carter felt that she should give the reasons for her proposal:
|
|
| |
|
i)That the food co-op was obliged to carry out a number of functions
which had not been done in line with expectations (outreach to the
community, door to door delivery, research into health).
|
|
| |
|
ii) The HAWK TRA could be liable if the funders did not accept
the outcomes.
|
|
| |
|
iii) There has been no real staff line management and no real interest
from the committee.
|
|
| |
|
iv) The co-op committee had residents on it from outside of HAWK
TRA area but the HAWK TRA committee would still be responsible if
anything went wrong.
|
|
|
|
7.2.3 |
Brian Kennedy stated that he had been unhappy with the setting
up of the food co-op as he feared it becoming a separate body and
moving its operations somewhere else to get funds.
|
|
|
|
7.2.4 |
Monique Carter reported that Michelle Asbury (the Food Co-op manager)
had left her post at the end of January but had stated that she
would be working from home to clear up paperwork with funders and
look for new funding.
|
|
|
|
7.2.5 |
Agreed that:
|
|
| |
|
i) The co-op should put in proposals to the HAWK TRA committee
at its next meeting and that these should be to either wrap up or
to become independent.
|
|
| |
|
ii)If the co-op wraps up then HAWK TRA should support the fruit
and vegetable stall continuing at Haggerston.
|
|
| |
|
iii)Michelle Asbury provide a report to the next co-op and TRA
committee meetings on: How far she had got with reporting to the
current year’s funders; what further work needed to be done; whether
the TRA was likely to be asked for any return of funds; whether
there was any certain funding for the future and how much.
|
|
| |
|
iv)Monique Carter to write a letter to the food co-op committee
stating her proposals and asking members to vote at the next meeting.
|
|
|
8.
|
|
Service Level Agreement (SLA) with Haggerston Area Trust (HAT)
|
|
| |
|
Not discussed.
|
|
|
9.
|
|
Any other Business
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
Signatories to HAPTRA
|
|
|
|
9.1.1 |
HAPTRA (representing tenants of estates in Hackney transferred
to Housing Associations) requires 2 signatories from HAWK TRA.
|
|
|
|
9.1.2 |
Agreed that Nick Strauss and Tom Seabury be nominated as signatories
to HAPTRA.
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
Next General Meeting
|
|
| |
|
Agreed that:
|
|
| |
|
i)The next General Meeting of HAWK TRA be held on Monday April
2nd at 7-30 pm.
ii)Harsha Amin (from the Council) and Robin Hawkes (from Canalside)
be asked to attend for questions, each person under a specific agenda
item.
iii)2 Turkish speaking interpreters be present at the meeting.
|
Tenant Support Worker, TRA Secretary
|
| |
|
iv)The meeting needs someone who would be a strict chair.
|
Committee
|